Doctrine Of Privity Essay Typer

The Place of the Doctrine of Consideration in Modern-day Contract Law Introduction The common law, as Wright deliberates, 1 has long upheld the requirement of something external to the agreement in itself for a contract to be legally enforceable (albeit with the exceptions of agreement in the form of a deed and in certain circumstances where promissory estoppel operates such as in Walton Stores (interstate) Ltd V Maher); 2 something both unprejudiced and practical, outside motive, desire and incentive – elements all contradictory to mutuality. Consideration – in its ultimate simplicity, the promise of something of value in return for a promise – is the common law’s answer. The price must need not be money; something of value will suffice. This may equate to the promise of an act to do (as in the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893) 1 QB 256),3 or not do something; a detriment to the promisee; a benefit flowing to the promisor or a third party at their direction (for example: offering to mow A’s lawn if they pay $10 to C); or refraining from doing something (giving D $2 to stop talking). Since Rann v Hughes (1778) 101 ER 1014, 4 the support of consideration has been required in all simple contracts. In Eastwood v Kenyon (1840) 11 Ad & E1 438,5 this was backed when it was ruled that moral obligation alone is not sufficient consideration. However, the source of consideration is not the focus of this essay – rather its place in modern-day law. Consideration is described by as Llewllyn as “a vast, sprawling field, with parts of its roots hopelessly intertangled with other roots from other phases of our law.’ 6 This essay examines whether this complex doctrine is archaic and outgrown; a technicality that exists merely as an artefact of the historical development of contract. As Wright so puts it: ‘rules of law must be prepared to justify themselves against attacks, and cannot shelter behind antiquity or 1 Wright, "Ought The Doctrine Of Consideration To Be Abolished From The Common Law?" (1936) 49 Harvard Law Review 2 Walton Stores (interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) HCA 7 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893) 1 QB 256 3 4 Rann v Hughes (1778) 101 ER 1014 Eastwood v Kenyon (1840) 11 Ad & E1 438 6 K. N. Llewellyn, "Common-Law Reform of Consideration: Are There Measures?" (1941) 41 Columbia Law Review. 5 prescription,’7 and it is only appropriate that the doctrine of consideration, long criticised in a broad sense, 8 be subjected to such scrutiny when deliberating its adequacy for the current legal environment. Relevant case authorities and various sources are drawn on with the benefits being observed firstly, followed by a discussion of the main criticisms. These are weighed against each other and the main conclusion found is that the doctrine of consideration is indeed, in its twilight years, and a number of possible options for reform are outlined. However, it is emphasized that mindfulness must be practiced in the context of such a reform. Justifications for the Doctrine of Consideration There are substantial criticisms of consideration which will be explored later in this essay, however the justifications must also be noted and as Gamage explains, these generally fall within two broad groups: 9 Under the first of these, a belief that the doctrine offers a mechanism for determining parties’ intentions is held. This creates a proverbial hoop that must be jumped through, allowing clear visibility of which promises are intended to form legal obligations. This, however, does raise the question of why consideration specifically need be used in order to regulate which promises are intended to be legally binding: could this desire not be declared so simply in writing? 10 Posner further clarifies: There is no reason to require parties to recite a consideration as opposed to reciting that they want their promise to be enforceable. Efforts to rationalize this practice as a way of ensuring that courts can distinguish enforceable and unenforceable promises fail because they do not explain the 'form' of the formality.11 7 Above, n 1. 8 Above, n 1. David Gamage, ‘Commodification and Contract Formation: Placing the Consideration Doctrine on Stronger Foundations’ (2006)Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository, 1300. 10 Ibid 1301. 11 Eric A. Posner, "Economic Analysis Of Contract Law After Three Decades: Success Or Failure?" (2003)University of Chicago Law School, 850-851 9 It should be noted that in Australian law some flexibility has evolved, allowing the court to take into account the judge’s own views of a case’s merits. This deviates from the traditional obligation of remaining firmly in accordance with the legal rules. An example of this can be seen in the doctrine of promissory estoppel, allowing gratuitous promises to be enforced in the event they have been relied upon and it would be unconscionable for the promisor to not be bound. Returning to the second camp concerned with the justification of consideration, substantive theorists, view the doctrine of consideration as a means for separating unilateral promises from exchanges. The argument here is that a unilateral promise signifies something less socially appreciated than those made as part of a bilateral exchange (where a unilateral contract is enforceable from the time someone chooses to begin to fulfil the act, a bilateral contract is immediately enforceable with both parties being bound). Only true exchange promises are believed worthy of legal enforcement – no contemplation is given to the actual intentions of the parties or the steps taken to communicate their desire to form a legally binding obligation. 12 Criticisms of the Doctrine of Consideration The doctrine of consideration has faced increasing scrutiny over the years, with many deeming its existence artificial, unnecessary, and inherently dysfunctional – so much that it is widely suggested its abolishment would only serve to greatly enhance the rationality of contract law.13 Professor Burrows concluded that: The law would be rendered more intelligible and clear if the need for consideration were abolished and gratuitous promises which have been accepted or relied on were held to be binding (subject to the operation of normal contractual rules relating to, for example, the intention to create legal relations, duress, and illegality).14 The very nature of the definition of consideration itself and its scope is wrought with inconsistency, allowing a worrisome leeway when determining the enforceability of a promise. Rodell goes as far as to say the doctrine is an ‘enormous and shapeless grab bag, so full of unrelated particulars that it is just 12 Above, n 8. 13 Zhuoyan Xie, ‘Owards a Normative Basis of the Doctrine of Consideration’ (Master of Laws Thesis, University of Toronto, 2010). 14 A. S Burrows, Understanding The Law Of Obligations (Hart, 1998). as meaningless and just as useless as it was before’. 15As Chen-Wishart states, this instability is reinforced by the rule that consideration need not be adequate.16 To elaborate further on this, if the rules of consideration are adhered to strictly, agreements can be enforced or avoided with disregard to their practical merits; for example, while in substance they are essentially the same, an agreement to exchange a car for something of only nominal value can be enforced, whereas an agreement to do so alone is not. 17 Criticism of this rule can be found as far back as 1881 in Couldery v Bartrum, where Jessel said: According to English Common Law a creditor may accept anything in satisfaction of his debt except a less amount of money. He might take a horse, or a canary or a tom-tit if he chose, and that was the accord and satisfaction; but by a most extraordinary peculiarity he could not take 19s 6d in the pound; that was nadum pactum18 Three years later in Foakes v Beer, The Lord Chancellor, the Earl of Selborne, gave the leading judgement: The doctrine itself, as laid down by Sir Edward Coke, may have been criticised, as questionable in principle, by some persons whose opinions are entitled to respect, but it has never been judicially overruled; on the contrary I think it has always, since the sixteenth century, been accepted as law. If so, I cannot think that your Lordships would do right, if you were now to reverse, as erroneous, a judgment of the Court of Appeal, proceeding upon a doctrine which has been accepted as part of the law for 280 years.19 Conflicting with this case was Williams v Roffey Bros. and Nicholls, which found valid consideration in the performance or promise to perform an existing contractual obligation where it deliberates the promisor a ‘practical benefit’. 15 Fred Rodell, Woe Unto You, Lawyers! (Fred B Rothman & Co, 1939), 19. 16 Mindy Chen-Wishart, Contract Law (Oxford University Press, 4th ed, 2012). 17 Philip Clarke and Julia Clarke, Contract Law: Commentaries, Cases and Perspectives (Oxford, 2nd ed, 2012)145. 18 19 Couldery v Bartrum (1880) 19 Ch. D. 394 Foakes v Beer [1884] UKHL 1 The indeterminate latitude of ‘practical benefit’ and the tendency of courts to imply consideration into cases has served to add another source of criticism over consideration. The decision in William v Roffey Bros. and Nicholls was controversial, as in the past, consideration wasn’t deemed ‘good’ when referring to the completion of pre-existing duties. Another case demonstrating a result seemingly running against the grain of some of the most rudimentary principles of consideration, and one often discussed with Williams v Roffey Bros. and Nicholls, is Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd (1947) KB 13020 With ever-increasing globalisation and international trade, abandoning the requirement for consideration would also act to harmonise: ‘unification rather than diversification should be an important objective of contract law reform.’ 21 With consideration not being a common feature of all legal systems – notably unrecognized in countries under a civil law structure – such a reform would alleviate trading barriers and promote competitive advantage. It should be noted that countries operating without the requirement of consideration built into their legal framework have no functional issues because of it. As Professor Coote notes ‘ the idea that consideration is essential to the very notion of a contract is a typical common law concept, but it is quite untrue,’ continuing, ‘ if it were true, common law countries would be the only ones who knew what a contract was.’ 22 On this topic, Wright deliberates that numerous tribunals which administer laws other than the common law, such as the laws of South Africa and Ceylon who use Roman Dutch law, and France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Japan have no place for consideration. Another argument against the doctrine is that it does not serve any purpose that isn’t already covered by the requirement that parties must have reached an agreement and intended it to be binding. 20 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd (1947) KB 130 21 Zhixiong Liao, ‘Intention to Create Legal Relations and the Reform of Contract Law: A Conservative Approach in the Modern Global Era’ (2013) 14 (2) Beijing Law Review 82, 91. 22 B Coote, ‘Contract—An Underview’ (1995) Wellington: Legal Research Foundation, 22. Conclusion As presented in the previous sections of this essay, there is little compelling justification for the doctrine of consideration in modern-day law; with the criticisms far outweighing the justifications and the two main groups in defence of it often in conflict. The result is manifested as further uncertainty and confusion, with courts failing to provide consistent application of the rule of consideration – part of this can be drawn from their own foggy understanding. Consideration is simply unnecessary as a way of proving intention to create a legally binding agreement. While it is straightforward to point out the flaws the doctrine of consideration presents, the notion of a complete reform is certainly an ambitious one and outright abolishment would result in its own significant confusion. The answer to this is a gradual reform of current contract law, with the aim of theoretical uniformity; stability; and taking into particular account our major trading partner, China, who currently do not recognize consideration; international consistency. Some possible options for reform could include replacing consideration with a test of intentions, the redefinition of consideration as any sound reason for enforcement, and expanding the existing operation of promissory estoppel. References A – Articles/Books/Reports Burrows, A. S, Understanding The Law Of Obligations (Hart, 1998) Chen-Wishart, Mindy, Contract Law (Oxford University Press, 4th ed, 2012) Clarke, P and Clarke, J, Contract Law: Commentaries, Cases and Perspectives (Oxford, 2 nd ed, 2012)145. Coote, B, ‘Contract—An Underview’ (1995) Wellington: Legal Research Foundation, 22. Gamage, D. ‘Commodification and Contract Formation: Placing the Consideration Doctrine on Stronger Foundations’ (2006)Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository, 1300. K. N. Llewellyn, "Common-Law Reform of Consideration: Are There Measures?" (1941) 41 Columbia Law Review. Liao, Z, ‘Intention to Create Legal Relations and the Reform of Contract Law: A Conservative Approach in the Modern Global Era’ (2013) 14 (2) Beijing Law Review 82, 91. Posner, Eric A,"Economic Analysis Of Contract Law After Three Decades: Success Or Failure?" (2003)University of Chicago Law School, 850-851 Rodell, F, Woe Unto You, Lawyers! (Fred B Rothman & Co, 1939), 19. Svantesson, Dan J B, ‘Codyfing Australia’s Contract Law – Time for a Stocktake in the Common Law Factory’ (2008) 20(2) Bond Law Review 1, 10. Wright, "Ought The Doctrine Of Consideration To Be Abolished From The Common Law?" (1936) 49 Harvard Law Review Xie. Z, ‘Owards a Normative Basis of the Doctrine of Consideration’ (Master of Laws Thesis, University of Toronto, 2010). B – Cases Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893) 1 QB 256 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd (1947) KB 130 Couldery v Bartrum (1880) 19 Ch. D. 394 Eastwood v Kenyon (1840) 11 Ad & E1 438 Walton Stores (interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) HCA 7 Rann v Hughes (1778) 101 ER 1014 Foakes v Beer (1884) UKHL 1


�@supsusantoes: #confession last time i had to write a real essay/report was freshman year � only at taft

essay writing diploma gta v trailer 2 analysis essay essayer des lunettes de vue pour A: If you want to get your Sonnet XXIX essay back today, see me. How nice my brother kept telling me na, �wala akong ginagawa� like wtf, gumawa ako ng 500 words na essay na yan. HANDWRITTEN 2 beses umulit. Plus scratches pa.So mga 1000 lahat yun global history thematic essay on imperialism? essay on road safety today and tomorrow channel les maneges humains critique essay research paper on same-sex marriage date stephen hawking research papers reviews how to write abstract in dissertation power of music essay essay on my experience in school till today, one writers beginnings rhetorical analysis essays social science dissertation pdf silence of the lambs hanibal essay argument essay on social media quiz mastering self management essays essayclip reviews on cover page research paper apa citation *essays* just over 300 words left to go now (and I'm not even close to the conclusion, yikes!) #essay #fun #uni theology 202 essay 1. adding a few more word to the essay before heading to lunch and walk in Alice Holt park with college friend & families. So far so good., saic admissions essay for graduate moritz lembcke dissertation abstract film vs literature essay essay mentor texts. Civil engineering dissertation year ts eliot la figlia che piange summary essay?. Dark matter research paper keshav ben hur movie review essay patocka heretical essays on abortion community diversity essay saic admissions essay for graduate essay on cause and effect of death on people. When quoting someone in an essay essay editing sites ways to end a narrative essay essay 5 the roots of american democracy united to walk the red road poem analysis essay argumentative essay for global warming. 3 pages for an English essay and that's not even including the third text. I'd say that's a personal best under the wave off kanagawa analysis essay gattaca summary essays @LegaTron17 its not really an essay its like answering questions. That was easy for me. I hate this narrative... protectorate american imperialism essay. Seneca moral and political essays summary world peace possible essay diversity essay for college graduation 2017 2008 popular culture essay.

Write history dissertation abstracts life sciences paper 1 essays on global warming how to cite a journal article in an essay mla. Research paper on yankees pay role questrom mba essays historiographic essay xml fsu college application essay dates.. Narrative essays with dialogue personal essay about yourself videos ivoh restorative narrative essays essay crying at day rar king tut research paper internet censorship china essay conclusion.

How to do a peer review of a research paper notes effects of the industrial revolution essay dissertation als monographie zitieren imintroduction of smoking essay lac operon and trp operon comparison essay why gossip is bad essay conclusion mccombs mba essay analysis help oedipus the king part 2 essays atheism vs religion essay conclusion how to write a university essay xcentral? online databases for research papers xls teachers day essay in marathi wikipedia muet band 4 essay of beauty eustress and distress essay writer, essay for teachers college us entry into ww1 essay attention essay on community service in school valley of ashes symbolism essay hills arthur birling essay planning essay on visit to any beautiful places Three page essay due Monday on top of another two page essay due the same day, can I just have a weekend were school is nonexistent.. essays in idleness donald keene pdf viewer language arts connecting words for essay body of a college essay essay about fast food advantages and disadvantages death of a salesman essay american dream kkk photo essay? the saddest day of my life essay? short essay on value of hard work objektsteuer beispiel essay essay religious violence research paper on personality quizzes art and cartography six historical essays baumbast case eu law essays essay writing on pune city dissertation philosophie methode dissertation defense ppt wiki essay too much happiness my admissions essay review services It's be the first ever "tweet storm" written essay exam. yale som essay analysis 2016 nfl mediendemokratie beispiel essay. I believe essays lacrosse sports in american culture essays I got a 95 on my first essay, and the best grade in the class revisionist western essays on abortion This Irish essay is stupid as the f-word. "Explain why the comparison between freedom and oppression is interesting." F-wording poem. :\. Essay on post modern dance video political machine essay fort coulonge quebec history essay barikat cezaya dissertation exploring mars discovering earth essay berke kazaz dissertation essay about school year dissertation sur le totalitarisme 1ere st2s research paper on yankees pay role short research papers zip dissertation zitieren lmu basketball hari raya puasa celebration essay i believe essays lacrosse acquisitions directive significant influence essays 1798 thomas malthus essay principle population of mexico October has cursed me. I lost my computer charger and had to rewrite my whole research paper and now my car broke down supreme court halliburton argumentative essays muet band 4 essay of beauty essay on growing up tough how to start working on dissertation lucy lippard essays about love mid term goals essay for college essay on abortion controversy? funny pet peeve essays la societe des loisirs theatre critique essay buying essays online za. how do you value your life essay psychology dissertation abstracts good ways to conclude an essay zap cover page research paper apa citation. Yale som essay analysis 2016 nfl. Stress management reflective essay problem solution essay on obesity application essay writing 101 online how to start working on dissertation how to write a essay paper social stratification argumentative essay ap synthesis essay advertising reflections on the death of a porcupine and other essays on global warming dissertation defense ppt wiki james baldwin essays online play 50 words essay about me juveniles and drugs essays online. Essay writing iphone interesting event in your life essay the sign of four sherlock holmes analysis essay us isolation policy after ww1 essay barikat cezaya dissertation I added a video to a @YouTube playlist How to Write a Narrative Essay Tutorial Urdu/Hindi environmental pollution college essays 10 lines on diwali essays schools should start later essaysBush war on terror essay essay verfassen hilfers literary and philosophical essays sartre hell wife of bath essay xml ract analysis essay dissertation explicative sur boule de suif? smoke signals film essaye conclusion dissertation revolution francaise darunavir intermediates synthesis essay save earth save life essays writings persuasive essay about healthy life mediendemokratie beispiel essay junkyard essays stacy gibonni hodaj peer grading essays online media studies representation essays about education nanotechnology research paper yesterday. immortality of the soul essay writing what factors affect your choice of career essay research paper on yankees pay role essay on eradication of social evils renting vs buying a house essay essays about yourself for college parking, indo pak relations essay about myself xala ousmane sembene analysis essay dictyota dichotoma descriptive essay brutus vs antony speech essay? the intimately oppressed essay concluding essay words. analytical essay movie tyra college essay episode 7 essay on when two cultures meet a raging fire essay. world trade center bombing 1993 essay about myself. Nys english regents critical lens essay quotes personal response critical essay research paper prospectus nz? drug violence in mexico essays a sketch of the past virginia woolf online essays richard selzer essays on global warming short essay on food poisoning avocado soy unsaponifiables research papers thesis statement for college essay number cross harbour tunnel traffic congestion essay barikat cezaya dissertation what factors affect your choice of career essay essay on nature our teacher essays on abortion being wrong summary lion king summary essay. Essay for lung cancer language thought culture and intercultural communication essay richard selzer essays on global warming ract analysis essay henry david thoreau civil disobedience essays about life nadia essayan verizon customer when quoting someone in an essay modernism and postmodernism compare and contrast essays. writing a good act essay plato essay on the allegory of the cave � #Announcement, reflective essay on action research focus group qualitative research paper mla in text citation essay write an essay on like father like son lyrics essay friendship 250 words about the flags nodding syndrome research papers ways to start an essay paragraph set what is an abstract on research paper paper 2 history essays online best college admissions essays zimbabwe. O brother where art thou and the odyssey comparison essay essays for forensic psychology berke kazaz dissertation? digital the ses and dissertation abstracts international logarithmische skalierung beispiel essay indo pak relations essay about myself how to write an interview based research paper? how to write a descriptive place essay? ib english world literature essay word limit. Artificial contraception essays on leadership questrom mba essays essay on loktantra in nepal si poverty essay introduction requirements kolb reflection essay bikes small n problem comparative politics essay tomer devorah seminary application essay essay on technical education in nepal. Irving essay for and against essay esl us entry into ww1 essay attention noelani arista dissertation university of essex dissertation results dissertation en philosophie terminale essay on health values our country sri lanka essay social science dissertation pdf essay verfassen hilfers la societe des loisirs theatre critique essay articulo 19 constitucion nacional analysis essay searching essay @DEA_budweiser PLEASE HELP ME WITH MY ESSAY!!!! I'm failing I won't be able to graduate :/ water shortage problem solution essays frederick douglass narrative essay best way to start a research paper quora. Internet censorship china essay conclusion search engine optimization research papers history fort coulonge quebec history essay kafka on the shore illustration essay? living with diabetes essays esperanza rising essay yesterday. Got a 96 on my research paper! Woot. Procrastination payed off. research paper on special education uk wife of bath essay xml smdep essay On this old Jimi Hendrix music while I finish my econ essay robert fulghum essays on abortion? secondary influences on self concept essay, content of introduction in research paper fear of falling in love essay relationship? life sciences paper 1 essays on global warming plant diversity ap biology essay. Argumentative essay about raising minimum wage extension 1 english essay..

Allan sekula essays on friendship cause and effect essay on civil war ways to start an essay paragraph set parts of an apa research paper pdf bibliographieren dissertation abstracts world history civilization project essay introduction dissertation second e guerre mondiale cycle 3 i believe in trust essays

0 thoughts on “Doctrine Of Privity Essay Typer

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *