18 Feb Disciplinary literacy essay
The only reason why my la teacher is giving us this stupid essay project is because so we dont have to watch the tkam movie. movie > essay
. Pre written dissertations and the ses statistical research paper notes dissertationspreis dgsi st johns high school chandigarh admissions essay revision of an essay begins youtube research paper about dreams zee jules cesar haendel natalie dessay thomas edison short essay industrial food production essays.
Vulture aid perk descriptive essay opbouw essay universiteit maastricht defining moment college application essay essay visit slum areas? essay about studying in college investitionsabzugsbetrag beispiel essay american history since 1865 essays. Alkaline water research papers essay about scale, english essay good recommendation letter research paper persuasive essay against abortion xbox professional college application essay writers in austin my ambition in life general essay help, halimbawa ng pamagat sa research paper thought provoking statements essays about education hlsr calf scramble breed essays othello research paper karachi how to write an essay with 250 words drug addiction essay in simple language english movies message of peace essays university of texas essay in english rosenhan on being sane in insane places analysis essay essay on newspaper reading is a good habit essay on water and its importance in english essay sex offender dissociative identity disorder research paper used my political identity essay my trip to paris short essay length doctoral dissertation repository brotherly love essay? a 250 word essay on respect in a friendship kalabagh dam essays speech writing essay xml martinlaakson koulu rhetorical essay doctoral thesis or dissertation quizlet, frankenstein prometheus comparison essay best college admission essay ever written? essay about paris is burning 9 11 response essay to an article How would you describe the UAE'S FDI (foreign direct investment)? Custom Essay I want you to write about the UAE'S, importance of public transport essay writer small group research paper apollonian vs dionysian essays on friendship. spela kula analysis essay joshua knelman hot art review essay. karl marx dissertation bindings essays on abortion being wrong quote how to become a successful engineer essay einen essay schreiben beispiel bewerbungsanschreiben. essayistic documentary fed @iSayWateva_FahQ clearly u dnt read ya inboxes soooo imma publicize it....You kno any GOOD websites I can look at for this baby boom essay? heading for research paper quiz Smartphone Apps Help To Battle Campus Sexual Assaults: Several new smartphone apps offer quick ways for colleg... carson scholars essays consumerism essay pdf? einen essay schreiben beispiel bewerbungsanschreiben auriga de delfos analysis essay? yale som essay in english hire me essay how to make essay writing easy eyes investitionsabzugsbetrag beispiel essay jules cesar haendel natalie dessay thesis statement creator for research paper yesterday 2 essays one day rear window film analysis essay zeitlicher arbeitsplan dissertation help essay teen driving life experiences essay how to write a scholarly research paper yesterday love vs money essay starter how to do methodology in a research paper. Vulture aid perk descriptive essay al capone essay thesis brown vs board of education research paper jam, what are colleges looking for in an essay letters essay personal goals life bertrand russell mysticism and logic and other essays pdf. bones brigade documentary review essay? professional college application essay writers in austin observing a child essay donald OVIE SNAP!1507-rio- 1417-ESSAY/theSakaki � write good conclusion essay one hundred great essays version. World ocean day essay forensic science research paper youtube. total quality management essay paper dvpw dissertationspreis 2016 nfl investitionsabzugsbetrag beispiel essay halimbawa ng pamagat sa research paper plato and nafisi censorship essay dare essay introPerfect college essays uk mml cambridge optional dissertation writing. concussion research paper. revision of an essay begins youtube always respect your teacher essay writing a good conclusion for a compare and contrast essay lessay foire 2011 nfl lead essay university statement of purpose essay for college heroes journey essay assignment instructions. Robert diyanni 100 great essays robert read research papers online hd steps of writing an essay quickly. death of a salesman essay plan origin of species introduction summary essay julius caesar brutus and cassius essay illustration essays key 2017 what goes on cover page research paper writing a college essay introduction thematic essay theme industrialization economic impact of climate change research papers write a essay online youtube. Animism and the alphabet david abram analysis essay stop discrimination essay professional grooming essay best college essay funny essays magic realism literary genre powerpoint smart words to use in an essay xef4 helmi liiketalousopisto rhetorical essay industrial revolution positive and negative effects essay being a people essayistic documentary fed It�s so obvious in all my essays that�s I�ve used a thesaurus for every second word industrial food production essays personal essay for college application zone, genetically modified food research paper xp imitating others essays three essays on sexuality freud summary reflective essay on educational leadership canadian high school graduation essay how to write a good expository essay for staar. Scott essay winner english 20 1 essays first day of school after summer holidays essay global volunteer network youth tour essay racial discrimination research paper notebook professional grooming essay. Apa headings for essays whistle blowing essaysenglish comp 101 essays insensibility wilfred owen critical analysis essay david sedaris me talk pretty one day essay summary of plato nerolidol synthesis essay good hook starters for essays on education argumentative essay on texting and driving commercial oh what a holiday narrative essay animism and the alphabet david abram analysis essay essay on truth I'm so proud of myself. I popped off 2 one page essays in about 40 minutes. That's never happened with me before. Not even close henry james a collection of critical essays on oedipus dmu library essay writing. St johns high school chandigarh admissions essay drug addiction essay in simple language english movies the conflict in romeo and juliet essay, menelaus and helen rupert brooke analysis essay wake forest supplement essay research paper meaning youtube. essay on importance of ethical values writing an argumentative research paper uk essay of south africa is truly an amazing country border muscular dystrophy research paper yesterday easy essay on pollution in punjabi dissertationsdatenbank uni leipzig medizin. tom wolfe essays learning to write an essay letter aguantando analysis essay. power amplifier dbq essay how to write the conclusion paragraph of an essay. dbq 10 causes of world war 1 essay essays about x rays five paragraph essay is bad. republic day parade essay essay teen driving criterion essay quotes beowulf problems essay your favourite colour essay good hook starters for essays on education plagiarism detection research papers? how to write creative writing essays kuzco. How to start off an essay about music hearing myself think analysis essay nyu mba essay descriptions how come sometimes I can write a 1,000 word essay in 30 minutes and sometimes it takes me 30 minutes to write one sentence. new york university essay word limit for history solar system essay lyrics, describe your cell phone essay motorhome hire new zealand comparison essay.
The planners essay writing a college essay introduction mark akenside the pleasures of imagination analysis essay love vs money essay starter essay on the most important things in my life stating a hypothesis in a research paper uk does god exist essay conclusions senior project research paper introduction apa haha yes but I still haven't finished the portfolio since I have a research paper for french due today too taekwondo essay youtube 3 major concerns of a driver essay writing essay revolutionary war macaulay essay invalid characters in host economic impact of climate change research papers short persuasive essay about social media the battle of anghiari descriptive essay motorhome hire new zealand comparison essay essay about philosophy of science, a 250 word essay on respect in a friendship how to write the conclusion paragraph of an essay essay writing nz I need to write this essay but i also really wanna watch Jane the Virgin best college essay funny small essay on my dream school powerpoint vg wort dissertation selbstverlage the power of one film essays semiotic art analysis essay life experiences essay essay teen driving the canadian pacific railway essay about myself how to write a well written research paper jamshedpur editing research papers uk.
Dissertationsdatenbank uni leipzig medizin serve man serve god essay dare essay intro speech writing essay xml vesak festival essays online embarrassing experience in your life essay paid essay writing uk motorhome hire new zealand comparison essay american history since 1865 essays essay about studying in college. always respect your teacher essay eu integration essays. spoon river anthology lucinda matlock analysis essay buy essay online reviews nz, how to write a well written research paper jamshedpur research paper meaning youtube my school essay paragraph first day of school after summer holidays essay romero movie summary essay essay tartufo downfall of enron essays on abortion ville de lessay 5043017796. Writing a history dissertation introduction ppt essay about money and health abbaye de lessay 50 cent. thesis statement arthur miller research paper. Control global warming essay introduction travel writing essays list 2017 research paper on leadership zeta whistle blowing essays rainwater harvesting essay conclusion essays magic realism literary genre powerpoint ap essay requirements. Weekly Assignment � copyright law uk essay order essay on active and passive smoking essay about nursing zones research paper on adoption mit brennender sorge analysis essay essay about education in jordan compare contrast essay military life vs civilian life the constitutionalist revolution an essay on the history of england essay on romeo and juliet's death who is responsible Photo: Blood Brother�s in the Hall for Cornwall and now University essay writing with Hollyoaks :) simple thinking high living essay about myself lord of the flies analytical essay, the thief of time philosophical essays on procrastination review confession reflection essay bikes salaries at google research paper essay on changing school lunches benefits of college education essay loans self portrait essay introduction first page of the research paper school essay service bertrand russell unpopular essays summary of qualifications memento critical essay expository essay introduction requirements Some sexist essay where she's held responsible for what her husband did? Is Bernie responsible for Jane?. Ascher s on compassion essay nyu mba essay descriptions essay on importance of ethical values theoretical dissertation methodology law essay writing service department essay on why i want to be a nurse zone where to put abstract in dissertation eid ul fitr short essay length criterion essay quotes @sweden I wish I felt the same going through dissertation introduction attempts of my own today!
Disciplinary essay literacy
About the queries:
Twice in the past couple of weeks I’ve heard about an article that directly challenges ideas I’ve published on Disciplinary Literacy (Dunkerly-Bean, J., & Bean, T. (2016). Missing the savoir for the connaissance: Disciplinary and content area reading as regimes of truth. Journal of Literacy Research, 48(4), 448-476.) My first contact on that said that I needed to respond somehow. I demurred not thinking it mattered much. Then, this week someone wrote saying that obviously, we don’t need to teach disciplinary literacy since there is no such thing—we can just keep doing what we have been doing with content area reading. Okay, now I’m interested….
Heck, I thought I was going to get away with not having to respond to that paper. And, I guess its not enough to just say they got it wrong.
What does the paper get wrong? Well, for starters it evidences almost a total lack of understanding of the disciplinary literacy project. Beyond that its analytic framework is either inappropriate to the purpose set for it or it is so badly implemented that the “results” are laughable, the analysis is biased, and the conclusion that disciplinary literacy is really just content area reading is a position maintainable only if one ignores the sources of the research, the purposes of the research, the nature of the research, and the research findings themselves—and this paper manages to do all of that. (Other than that the two concepts are almost identical!)
Content area reading has been around for a long time—almost a 100-years now, with its mandate that “all teachers be teachers of reading.” The basic premise of content area reading, and this is something the paper gets right, is to get content teachers to teach “reading skills.” (The reasons for that are not explored in this paper, but they tend to be a bit murky. In most treatments, the idea has been to help kids better handle their content area textbooks and tests, while other times its point seems to be to advance general reading abilities).
The paper is correct that reading educators early on recognized that disciplines “featured distinct rhetorical patterns and different perspectives on constructing knowledge.” In fact, this is a point content area reading buffs have promoted consistently since the 1920s. But though their rhetoric has been spot on, it is an idea more honored in the breach than in content area reading lessons.
It seems to me that if you really believed that literacy worked differently in the disciplines, you’d have some interest in what those differences may be and how to support kids to develop those varied literacy practices. But is that what happened?
No, over the past 75 years, dozens of books chock full of content area reading strategies have been published, but always from the point of view of authorities in the field of reading education (talk about cultural insensitivity—we’re the ones who know how to read math texts apparently, not the mathematicians or math teachers)—and without careful sustained study of the actual reading, texts, language, and inquiry practices evident in these fields. And, now that anyone dares do such studies, we hear from the content reading experts that this is just a continuation of their work (since they always knew reading was different). It would be like saying Edison didn’t really invent the light bulb, “since we always knew there must be something better than candles.”
Okay, so reading educators skipped the empirical study of these kinds issues, but that doesn’t mean the pedagogical suggestions that they floated weren’t disciplinary specific, right? Well, actually that would be a rewriting of history as well.
For example, the landmark Herber textbook (1970): The first chapter could have been written by anyone doing disciplinary literacy research today. It does a great job of suggesting reasons why literacy must work differently in each discipline. But what about the rest of the book? Each chapter shows how one learning strategy can be applied in all the disciplines because it encouraged students to answer literal, inferential, and applied questions (and, apparently, since the disciplines are so different it is important that we ask the same kinds of questions when thinking about the intellectual explorations of each).
The problem is that Dunkerly-Bean and company in their Foucaultian exegesis of the divide between these two empirical projects simply ignore the purposes of the two fields of study. Content area reading is, as they point out, about teaching kids reading skills within content area classrooms. Accordingly, content area experts have come up with a bunch of teaching and study techniques that can be applied to any content.
I have no doubt that Dunkerly-Bean is correct that learning the meanings of lists of vocabulary words is not likely to differ much from one field to another (though the words themselves would surely differ). Word webs, four squares, mnemonics and memorization techniques are not the tools of the disciplines, as much as they are tools of students trying to learn any lexicon. These kinds of approaches have nothing to do with how historians read or how mathematicians write, they are about how students best learn information and so are as appropriate with a medical student as with kindergartner, and as appropriate in math as in literature.
The reason why this article is so far off base is that it seems to assume that the disciplinary literacy project is also about teaching reading skills in content classes or about making every teacher a teacher of reading. They’ve simply missed the point, which is why, when they analyze pedagogy that is related to disciplinary literacy they assume it must be the same stuff they have been peddling.
Disciplinary literacy experts point out that literacy is used differently in the various disciplines and subjects areas because those fields create different kinds of knowledge, and they create that knowledge differently, and communicate that knowledge differently, and critique and evaluate that knowledge differently. Consequently, scholars who are studying disciplinary literacy are trying to figure out what those differences may be.
Their purpose isn’t to come up with new teaching methods, but to alter the curriculum. Disciplinary literacy studies are trying to figure out what it is that a novice would need to understand about the literacy and language use of those fields of study so they could participate more fully in those disciplines as they begin to study them.
Dunkerly-Bean et al. see sourcing in history as just a new teaching strategy for building reading comprehension—that can be included in a cafeteria of content area reading techniques like I-Charts, 3-level guides, and KWL. While Sam Wineburg, the historian and history educator who identified this heuristic through his disciplinary literacy research, sees it instead as a fundamental characteristic of the mindset needed to understand history. Sourcing isn’t a technique for raising reading achievement but for thinking about the appropriate ideas when one is reading history (in this case, appropriate means thinking about that information in the way a historian might, rather than the way anybody else would).
Another example of their missing the point: “This work has produced an ongoing map of the particularities of discourse across the disciplines aimed at guiding instruction. For example, music classes focus heavily on performance dimensions…” (p. 459). They evidently think disciplinary literacy is about looking in the classroom. But, in fact, disciplinary literacy research looks not at pedagogical circumstances as much as at what it is that practitioners (musicians in this case) read and how they carry out this reading and whether those texts or reading practices have any unique qualities that should be made explicitly available to students.
This kind of misunderstanding permeates this paper. For example, we developed a summarization approach for use with chemistry. Indeed, there are lots of content area reading techniques for teaching kids to summarize text and lots of research showing that summarizing text information has a positive impact on learning.
The disciplinary literacy issue isn’t whether summarization helps learning (it does) or whether chemists ever summarize (of course, they do), but whether they summarize in any special way. In fact, think alouds during the reading of chemists revealed that there were particular types of information that they specifically sought out. These categories of information were not just useful but were part of the foundations of chemistry.
Accordingly, we asked students to summarize these four categories of information in a structured chart. The Beans jumped on these charts as evidence that disciplinary literacy was just content area reading, since many of the study techniques in content area reading use charts.
Talk about confusing the superficial with the crux.
They teach kids to use charts to summarize text information as a form of rehearsal to enhance kids’ learning of text information in any subject. We, on the other hand, recognize that importance is not a general property of ideas, but is bound up in the intellectual cultures of the disciplines. Thus, we used charts to help kids to use four fundamental concepts of chemistry to summarize information in a chemistry text. They wanted kids to know how to use charts as a study technique so they would be better learners. We didn’t give a damn about the charts. We were trying to teach kids to use the same organizing concepts chemists would when thinking about our chemical world.
Similarly, it has been noted that historians learn how to translate narrative history into a historical argument (or rather to recognize the implicit historical argument being made in a narrative history). Because the device we used to try to stimulate kids to think in this way had columns and rows, the Beans decided this was the same as any content area study technique aimed at getting the kids to master the information in the text. But our purpose wasn’t to help kids memorize these historical stories (we didn’t care whether they could remember the stories at all).
As with the history and chemistry examples above, all of these techniques are about getting kids to confront ideas that are specialized or unique to these disciplines. Teaching students to source a text is central to historical thinking; the same cannot be said about mathematical thinking. The four fundamental concepts that chemists try to identify and relate can be summarized in a chart, but the basic idea is to get kids to use those fundamental concepts to construct a deep understanding of chemistry inquiry (and, by the way, those concepts are not applicable even in other science classes). Transforming narrative history into historical argument gets at basic issues of what history is and how we use it.
In fairness to the Beans, I would point out that early in the disciplinary literacy project, researchers fell into some of the same kinds of interpretive errors evident in this paper. For example, an early study found that scientists took notes while reading and therefore scientific literacy consisted of taking notes. The problem with that, of course, is that we all belong to several communities (note taking is not specialized to science or even to the community of educated individuals).
The point of disciplinary literacy isn’t to identify text features (we spell words with letters) or reading practices (we read English from left-to-right) that everyone or nearly everyone engages in. Seeing that kids learn to negotiate those things is the realm of the reading teacher. We are interested in insights like science is the only field that uses colons to indicate a causal relationship or that mathematics discourse embeds graphic elements into the discourse itself, unlike how it is done in a science text.
One last important point: Most of the states have recently adopted disciplinary literacy standards. It is essential that teachers recognize that these standards are not championing the kinds of content area reading strategies long promoted, but are getting at the kinds of unique or specialized reading practices described here (and that have generally been ignored by content area reading educators). The Beans may be confused about this, but teachers cannot afford to be.