How To Write History Ia Analysis Essay

Although they are divided into two separate sections (and separated by part C) the Summary of Evidence (B) and Analysis (D) are inextricably linked – or should be.  Although the sections are assessed as discrete entities, they both must relate to the research question and the analysis should be only of the evidence presented in B.

This can sometimes be frustrating ; you have spent a large part of your career as a history student trying to integrate these two elements effectively and now the IB wants you to separate them out.  If you have a clear understanding of what is evidence and what is analysis you will have no problem with these tasks.  If you have been struggling to understand which is which, the IA will teach you the differences and by the end of the IA process you will be a better writer in your timed essays because you will understand the mechanics of writing in the subject of history.

If you think about it, these two parts teach you two very different skills.  In the Summary of Evidence you learn how to select the right information to answer the question.  This section should be the longest section of the assignments and heavily referenced.  It is not uncommon to have 20 references in 600 words.  After all this section is just factual information, and if your topic is sufficiently narrow almost every sentence will require a reference.  In an assignment this brief you probably only have space for three or four main topics; be sure to explain your parameters in the Plan of Investigation.  It is perfectly acceptable to write this part in bullet form and some teachers encourage this to keep the material factual, but it is not necessary.

The Analysis is usually the second largest part of the project, and while there do not need to be many references, there must be some to receive more than 2 points.  Ideally this section will follow the same format as B so that the reader can draw parallels between the evidence and analysis of all core points.  You should also explain the importance of the sources you evaluated in C (which we’ll cover next week).  This is not a lengthy explanation, but it might be here where you compare the two sources with one another or explain further the utility of the source to your study.  In most cases, it is appropriate to include different historical perspectives, weighing them against one another and determining which school of thought makes the most sense given the information available.  You come close to your conclusion, but do not state it – yet.

These two sections are the bulk of the paper and once they are done, you should feel a real sense of accomplishment.

Ib Hl History Ia

1632 WordsMay 4th, 20127 Pages

HL History Internal Assessment

Was President Ronald Reagan the reason for the Cold War’s conclusion?

Word Count: 1,634

Was President Ronald Reagan the reason for the Cold War’s conclusion?

A. Plan of Investigation
This investigation focuses on the impact that President Ronald Reagan had on ending the Cold War between the United States of America and the Soviet Union during the 1980’s. The use of historian argumentation, primary sources, such as Ronald Reagan’s Address to the Nation on Defense and National Security, and analytical essays by well known professors, such as John Gaddis’s excerpt from Major Problems in American History Since 1945 – titled “Ronald Reagan’s Cold War Victory” – will be utilized. The origins, purposes, values,…show more content…

Evaluation of Sources
“Ronald Reagan’s Cold War Victory”, written by John Lewis Gaddis in 1989, is an analytical essay from Major Problems in American History Since 1945, an educational book meant to introduce those interested in history to primary sources as well as essays written by noted historians. Gaddis wrote this essay with the purpose of educating individuals on the role that President Ronald Reagan played in the Cold War. The essay’s value is due to the fact that it was written by an individual who experienced these historical occurrences firsthand. Furthermore, Gaddis has become a noted historian with multiple publications on the topic of the Cold War. The limitation of the essay is that the information contained within it is based on facts known to the public as of 1989 – a date which does not necessarily come after the conclusion of the Cold War; ergo, the amount of declassified documents and available information to historians and the public would have been minimal.
Another valuable source to this investigation was “Ronald Reagan’s Address to the Nation on Defense and National Security.” The address took place on March 23, 1983. The

Show More

0 thoughts on “How To Write History Ia Analysis Essay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *